4. The complainant did not submit any evidence to prove that the trademark google was well-known in China before December 3, 1999 when the disputed domain name was registered, therefore, the panel will not consider the possibility of protecting the trademark google as a well-known trademark.
The panel concluded that the complainant did not satisfy the first requirement of Article 8 of the Measures of the China Internet Network Information Center for the Resolution of Disputes Relating to Domain Names, which are applicable rules, and rejected the Google's claim.
Article 8 of the Measures provides that a complaint satisfying the following three requirements shall be upheld:
1. The disputed domain name is identical with or confusingly similar to the name or mark of the complainant in which the complaint has civil rights and interests;
2. The holder of the disputed domain name has no right or legitimate interest in respect of the domain name or major part of the domain name; and
3. The holder of the disputed domain name has registered or used the domain name in bad faith.